# Stéphane LUPASCO

**URL:** https://ps.zoethical.org/t/stephane-lupasco/2257
**Category:** 3TS Reader
**Tags:** author
**Created:** [March 6, 2019, 1:29pm UTC](https://ps.zoethical.org/t/stephane-lupasco/2257 "2019-03-06T13:29:55Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://ps.zoethical.org/uploads/default/original/2X/9/9eb088232ae3ace61d2d35e92896da8d59b6f2b3.png) [@system](https://ps.zoethical.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [March 6, 2019, 1:29pm UTC](https://ps.zoethical.org/t/stephane-lupasco/2257/1 "2019-03-06T13:29:56Z")

</div>

* * *

## title: Stéphane LUPASCO subtitle: Affectivité lang: fr

## À propos de l’auteur

{: #author .intro }

Stéphane LUPASCO, un Roumain à Paris, philosophe et professeur à La Sorbonne, a  
remis en question la logique Aristotélicienne à l’aûne de la physique quantique  
naissante. Il propose une tri-dialectique de l’énergie, physique tendant vers  
l’homogénéisation, biologique tendant vers l’hétérogénéisation, et psychique,  
correspondant à la logique de l’énergie au niveau micro-physique, tendant vers  
un état de plus haute contradiction, l’Ètat T, lieu de l’affectivité, à  
mi-chemin dans l’actualisation et la potentialisation des antagonistes.

## Sources

{: #sources .intro }

## Antagonistic Dualism

{: #antagonistic-dualism lang=“en” }

> In a general way, one must link the rational and the irrational, identity and  
> non-identity, the invariant and the variant […] by the constitutive  
> relation of contradictory complementarity, of a duality of dynamic terms, with  
> a principal double aspect, including, for each term, the passage from  
> potential to actual and the passage from actual to potential, each of the  
> terms acting on the other. One must avoid the sterile parallelist conception  
> of contradictory orders, as well as a monism favoring one order, by applying  
> the notion of error or appearance to the other.  
> {: lang=“en” }

## The Logic of Energy

{: #the-logic-of-energy lang=“en” }

> Energy must possess a logic that is not a classic logic nor any other based on  
> a principle of pure non-contradiction, since energy implies a contradictory  
> duality in its own nature, structure and function. The contradictory logic of  
> energy is a real logic, that is, a science of logical facts and operations,  
> and not a psychology, phenomenology or epistemology.  
> {: lang=“en” }